docsavage

Guy Savage

Doctor of Engineering in Engineering Management GWU

Master of Science in Systems Engineering GWU

Master of Business Administration from GMU

Bachelor of Science in Space Sciences Florida Tech

Developed the Holacratic Engineering Management process model, inherently disruptive and arising out of the agile software and lean systems engineering disciplines

Currently a Program Manager/Facilitator at for a small business government contractor and Laser Communications and Web3 consultant.

Holacratic engineering management and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are two distinct approaches to organizing and managing work within an organization. While they have some similarities, they also have some important differences.

One similarity between holacratic engineering management and DAOs is that both approaches aim to create more decentralized and autonomous organizational structures. In holacratic engineering management, this is achieved by breaking down traditional hierarchies and empowering teams to make decisions and take ownership of their work. In a DAO, this is achieved through the use of smart contracts and blockchain technology, which allow for the creation of decentralized decision-making processes and the automation of certain tasks.

Both holacratic engineering management and DAOs also place a strong emphasis on transparency and accountability. In holacratic engineering management, this is achieved through the use of clear roles and responsibilities, as well as regular meetings and check-ins to ensure that team members are meeting their goals and working effectively. In a DAO, this is achieved through the use of blockchain technology, which allows for the creation of a transparent and immutable record of all actions and decisions made within the organization.

However, there are also some important differences between holacratic engineering management and DAOs. Holacratic engineering management is primarily focused on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of engineering teams within an organization, while DAOs are designed to be decentralized organizations that operate on a global scale and can involve a wide range of stakeholders, not just engineering teams. Additionally, holacratic engineering management is typically implemented within the framework of a traditional organization, while DAOs operate independently of traditional organizational structures.

Overall, holacratic engineering management and DAOs are both approaches that aim to create more decentralized and autonomous organizational structures, but they differ in their focus and the technologies they use to achieve these goals.